qM vs FU k RESULTS

were just too good, our teamwork surpasses everyone elses, add that too our killing skills and thats an undefeated team you got there...........

when exactly did we play SMP in WF...?

worm fail -_-
smp wasn't the best ahahah.
or maybe I'm wrong
but we beat smp back when two fase and do or die were in it together. Smp is the ancestor to ar and iam.

Originally posted by Paw when exactly did we play SMP in WF...?

drokun tdm is their original mode? Didn't even know lol

Warfare is not hard at all. Infact all of qM would agree to play warfare over vctf. Because our chances are way higher, atleast in my opinion at winning. 

Originally posted by Hey_Look_its_Trendy Originally posted by chisox666 Originally posted by Deadaim yea its a shocker.   i think we can say game on lock all modes at this point.. i know strider will beef about warfare but we already beat smp/iam in their glory days @ warfare     SMP is not iAM. There are many different players playing under iAM that were not with SMP. I definitely wouldn't say qM has that mode on lock till they dominate iAM or kMa... Funny how everyone says the exact same thing until they get bent over. qM is in a whole 'nother league. It's not by luck that they have never lost, it's because the competition can't compare.

Sh!t man, I'd love to see qM try and "bend over" iAM or kMa in warfare. Bend over means "a$$ whooping," and any logical person knows that's not gonna happen. Win maybe, but ass whooping I think not. Maybe on the deathmatch wf maps such as sinkhole or market district we'd get our asses kicked, but I'm not factoring those in. I'll be the first to admit that qM has the best foot fraggers in the game by far, and that's the base for any 1st person shooter. But that's not going to stomp years of experience of playing warfare. If so, I'll join the rest of the masses and hug on qM's nuts...  

chisoxx we have even more experience winning games. Warfare isn't rocket science it's ut3. Just a different way to play it.
we have been battle tested. You see what shaker said? He said playing us was the hardest game he ever played. And mind you we played him on a eu server. And I'm pretty sure he participated against ar.

yet he said qm was the hardest match he ever played.
and normally with our top line up we usuually win easily. Because people underestimate us. LOL HOW DO You UNDERESTIMATE AN UNDEFEATED TEAM -_-
and bum yes bro we are always the away team.

Originally posted by BuMrUsH Warfare is not hard at all. Infact all of qM would agree to play warfare over vctf. Because our chances are way higher, atleast in my opinion at winning.  Ill be down to play KmA in warfare 5v5 and get that out the way & Striders EU team but LAST TIME PLAYING EU people..we only do it to prove people wrong..its business not pleasure..ar never gone play..ill be down to play one last vctf match against iAM. sick and tired of playing **** we dont like..when any one going step on our turf..been like a year since we played a HOME game..lol we stay as the AWAY team.

u have already proved 2 me yall beasts bum! but it would be sweet 2 play u guys 5v5 eu n usa but i got no server 4 EU :(

Originally posted by Blackfang chisoxx we have even more experience winning games. Warfare isn't rocket science it's ut3. Just a different way to play it. we have been battle tested. You see what shaker said? He said playing us was the hardest game he ever played. And mind you we played him on a eu server. And I'm pretty sure he participated against ar. yet he said qm was the hardest match he ever played. and normally with our top line up we usuually win easily. Because people underestimate us. LOL HOW DO You UNDERESTIMATE AN UNDEFEATED TEAM -_- and bum yes bro we are always the away team.

Your right, wf isn't rocket science. But it does take some strategy. There are orb routes, getting the redeemer, good spots to defend from, timing, certain pitfalls to avoid, certain things to pay extra special attention to, rides, etc. I honestly could care less about what Shaker said. I wouldn't make the assumption though that he faced AR, I don't think those guys really liked playing on EU servers. Could be wrong though. I'm not underestimating qM either. Maybe others have but nowhere in my posts does it hint towards underestimating you guys. I never underestimate an opponent. Because when you underestimate, that's an assumption. And assumptions are the mother of all f*ckups. For the most part.

As far as a warfare match goes between either qM and iAM or qM and kMa, I think either would be one hell of a match. May the best team win. No underestimating there.

Edit: Why don't I care what Shaker said? Because it doesn't pertain to me.

see thats why you don't play on your own turf yall skeered mwahaaaaa

and chisoxx lol helscream respects you aha. I was telling him iam's line up and he was saying who would do what he told me who would do what and he was like chisoxx is a smart player aha he doesn't say that about anybody. And dang I didn't know smp beat gow :o
and no I meant f uk did play ar. abut they only played american server. And shaker has been in f uk for the longest. So I was just saying he called qm his hradest match but everybody who's played us said that. 
and we wouldn't go into any match ignorant. Hel would show us anything we would need to know. We wouldn't waste time on anything super fancy pick up though. We don't win with secrets. We just do the fundamentals better than other teams. Tdm we he fundamental to any mode is killing ;)